The following editorial, on the effort to recall Gov. Kate Brown, originally appeared in The Daily Astorian on Aug. 3.
As Oregonians decide whether to sign petitions to recall Gov. Kate Brown from office, it is worth thinking back to whom she displaced in the governor's mansion.
That would be Gov. John Kitzhaber and first lady Cylvia Hayes.
Kitzhaber was hounded from office in 2015 after both were accused of conflicts of interest, particularly by blurring the lines between Hayes' public role and her private business endeavors. Subsequent investigations uncovered more smoke than fire. Kitzhaber agreed last year to pay a $20,000 fine to the state ethics commission, and this spring Hayes settled for a $50,000 fine.
It is difficult to argue that the state was well-served by the public rush to judgment against Kitzhaber.
His resignation catapulted then-Secretary of State Brown into the governorship. A continuing irony is that it was Republicans who stood up for Democrat Kitzhaber and helped finance his legal defense. Republicans recognized he was being railroaded from office. They also preferred his collaborative approach and moderately progressive views to Brown's all-out liberalism.
Brown served the rest of Kitzhaber's term and was elected last fall to what would be a final four-year term for her. Now, separate recall efforts have been launched by the Oregon Republican Party and by Michael Cross of Flush Down Kate Brown and the Oregon First! PAC. To force a recall election that could remove her from office, either group has until mid-October to collect just over 280,000 valid signatures from voters.
The first lesson from the Kitzhaber fiasco is whether Oregonians would be better off with a known quantity as governor or someone new.
A successful recall would elevate State Treasurer Tobias Read to the governorship. The current secretary of state, Republican Bev Clarno from central Oregon, was appointed to the position after Dennis Richardson's death and, as an appointee, is barred by the state constitution from filling a gubernatorial vacancy.
You have free articles remaining.
Read, a Beaverton Democrat, is bright, politically ambitious and well-regarded nationally for Oregon's programs to promote retirement savings. To much of Oregon, however, he remains relatively unknown.
Voters should be paying close attention and evaluating his leadership because there's a good chance he will run for governor — whether it's to succeed Brown in 2022 or, if she is recalled this year, as the short-term incumbent in a special election next year to finish her term.
In contrast, a related question is whether Brown, like Kitzhaber, eventually will mellow and moderate while in office. Of course, that took Kitzhaber until his unprecedented third term as governor. Unfortunately for Oregonians, Brown has shown no such inclination. Asked recently whether she planned to veto Republicans' legislation in retribution for their state Senate walkout in June, Brown told Politico, "I will just say . revenge is a dish best served cold and slowly."
Brown was the Democrats' key negotiator in the deal with Senate Republicans that ended their first walkout. She takes things personally, instead of recognizing that her and others' lack of clarity and specificity in that deal led to the second walkout.
Still, Brown is not the dominant cause of our state government's overreach and undisciplined spending. She is the enabler. She possesses the bully pulpit, she can institute her will through agency appointments and directives, but the greater fault lies with the Legislature that makes the laws — and ultimately with voters who have allowed one political party to dominate.
Instead of making gains in 2018, Republicans went the other way, allowing Democrats to achieve supermajorities in both chambers of the Legislature. One-party rule is not good for the state, regardless of which party it is.
Next year, three statewide offices are up for election — secretary of state, treasurer and attorney general — along with a majority of legislative seats. With the exception of certain urban legislative districts that are inexorably Democratic, each of those races provides an opportunity for Republicans to bring balance to our state government. A case can be made that the GOP should focus on those efforts — recruiting and financing excellent, independent-minded candidates who can appeal to voters in swing districts.
The recall campaigns against Brown may be great for venting political frustration, but the question for voters is: Would ousting a governor improve Oregon?