OK, I’m not going to change anyone’s mind about vaccines but maybe I can suggest better debating language.
Chris Foulke thinks it is hard to have rational or civil discussions about vaccines. Let’s see what Chris uses for language in his argument: propaganda and one-sided commercial hype, vehement, aggressive proponents, pumping small bodies full of toxic, societal suicide, kids dying rapidly after vaccinations, multiple diseases jammed into one vaccine.
This type of language doesn’t produce civil discussions and certainly not rational ones. This type of language is bullying and used to silence dissenting opinions.
Corvallis (Feb. 22)